Task #2985
Story #2829: Structural changes to D1 Data Types schema for Version 2.0 release
Should Nodes be required to have a subject?
Start date:
2012-06-19
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
0.00 h
Milestone:
CCI-2.0
Product Version:
2.0.0
Story Points:
Sprint:
History
#1 Updated by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago
- Assignee set to Robert Waltz
#2 Updated by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago
- Target version changed from Sprint-2012.29-Block.4.3 to Sprint-2012.33-Block.5.1
- Category set to d1_schemas
#3 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago
- Target version changed from Sprint-2012.33-Block.5.1 to Sprint-2012.37-Block.5.3
#4 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago
- Milestone changed from CCI-1.1 to CCI-1.2
#5 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago
- Target version changed from Sprint-2012.41-Block.6.1 to Sprint-2012.46-Block.6.3
#6 Updated by Robert Waltz almost 12 years ago
- Target version deleted (
Sprint-2012.46-Block.6.3)
#7 Updated by Robert Waltz about 11 years ago
- Milestone changed from CCI-1.2 to CCI-2.0
- Product Version set to 2.0.0
#8 Updated by Ben Leinfelder over 10 years ago
- translation missing: en.field_remaining_hours set to 0.0
- Status changed from New to Closed
In order to maintain backwards compatibility, I think it is best to leave the nodeSubject as optional.
#9 Updated by Robert Waltz over 10 years ago
- Assignee changed from Robert Waltz to Ben Leinfelder
- Estimated time set to 0.00
#10 Updated by Robert Waltz about 10 years ago
- Target version set to CCI-2.0.0
