Project

General

Profile

Task #2985

Story #2829: Structural changes to D1 Data Types schema for Version 2.0 release

Should Nodes be required to have a subject?

Added by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago. Updated over 9 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Ben Leinfelder
Category:
d1_schemas
Target version:
Start date:
2012-06-19
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
0.00 h
Milestone:
CCI-2.0
Product Version:
2.0.0
Story Points:
Sprint:

History

#1 Updated by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago

  • Assignee set to Robert Waltz

#2 Updated by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago

  • Target version changed from Sprint-2012.29-Block.4.3 to Sprint-2012.33-Block.5.1
  • Category set to d1_schemas

#3 Updated by Robert Waltz over 12 years ago

  • Target version changed from Sprint-2012.33-Block.5.1 to Sprint-2012.37-Block.5.3

#4 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago

  • Milestone changed from CCI-1.1 to CCI-1.2

#5 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago

  • Target version changed from Sprint-2012.41-Block.6.1 to Sprint-2012.46-Block.6.3

#6 Updated by Robert Waltz about 12 years ago

  • Target version deleted (Sprint-2012.46-Block.6.3)

#7 Updated by Robert Waltz about 11 years ago

  • Milestone changed from CCI-1.2 to CCI-2.0
  • Product Version set to 2.0.0

#8 Updated by Ben Leinfelder over 10 years ago

  • translation missing: en.field_remaining_hours set to 0.0
  • Status changed from New to Closed

In order to maintain backwards compatibility, I think it is best to leave the nodeSubject as optional.

#9 Updated by Robert Waltz over 10 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Robert Waltz to Ben Leinfelder
  • Estimated time set to 0.00

#10 Updated by Robert Waltz about 10 years ago

  • Target version set to CCI-2.0.0

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 14.8 MB)